Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 36208 (5.58 seconds)

V Anil Kumar vs Doordarshan on 15 April, 2025

2375-3500 with two years service will be eligible against the vacancies specifically earmarked for programme officer (Cameraman) SHAINESHAINEY VIJU CAT Bangalore Y VIJU ... 2375-3500 with two years service will be eligible against the vacancies specifically earmarked for programme officer (Cameraman) 12 From this, it becomes clear that
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

G S Saxena vs State Of Raj & Ors on 30 August, 2016

eligibility in this case shall be limited to five senior most eligible persons in all. Note: The zone of consideration of person eligible for promotion ... eligibility for promotion, the Wholetime Members may notwithstanding the condition of eligibility for promotion required unde sub-regulation (1) above, fill the vacancies
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

E Rajashekar vs E.S.I.C. on 30 August, 2023

against the vacancies for the vacancy year 2013 2013-14, will invariably be considered against the vacancies for the vacancy years ... against the vacancies for the vacancy year 2013-14 2013 14 will invariably be considered against the vacancies for the vacancy year
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next