Supreme Court
to be fraud on power of eminent domain of State and that in the present case,
the 5th respondent SIDCO, having admitted transfer ... that the impugned acquisition is
nothing but fraud on power of eminent domain. This order was never
challenged in appeal and has become final. Similar
individuals, for a public purpose, under the theory of 'Eminent Domain'. However, the rule of law, which governs and controls the executive functions
proceedings for acquisition of land by exercising the power of eminent domain would commence by issuing a notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land
purpose, for which, such acquisition is proposed. Such power of eminent
domain cannot be questioned by the petitioner. But, at the same time,
needless
challenging the proceedings. Needless to say that the
power of 'eminent and domain' always vest with the Government and therefore,
what
Rep. By Its General Secretary vs The Madurai Kamaraj University on 1 July, 2016
W
dispute resolution); inspection; and licensing.
Public functions need not be the exclusive domain of the state. Charities, self-regulatory organizations and other nominally private institutions ... writ of mandamus or the remedy under Article 226 is pre-eminently a public law remedy and is not generally available as a remedy against
Change India vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 6 April, 2016
Author: Pushpa Sathyanarayana
Bench
Sree Krishna Education Trust vs The Secretary To Government Of ... on 5 August, 2016
Author
