Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 190 (0.78 seconds)

Pramod Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 September, 2012

cannot be said to be made out.  In regard to threat complainant has stated that petitioner had  threatened   him   but   same   was   not   corroborated ... there   are   general   allegations  which   appear   that   it   is   only   empty   threat   to   them.   Thus,  learned   Magistrate   committed   illegality   in   taking   the  cognizance.  However
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

State vs Ankur Arora on 26 March, 2012

been named only due to some jealously or misunderstanding, empty threats do not prima facie mean that case U/s 506 IPC is made ... surprising how Ld. ACMM came to conclusion that such were empty threats or not enough to threaten the receiver i.e. complainant. From the facts
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next