Smriti Madan Kansagra vs Perry Kansagra on 28 October, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2020 SC
whole for the alleged
threat, it is only an empty threat without any follow up action. Hence, no
offence of criminal intimidation would be attracted
needs of the people. On a
demerur, he submitted that the empty threats would not constitute
intimidation. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted
3316 of 2016
not arise. Further, except for the empty threat, there has been no other
action furtherance.
11.It is seen that the civil
absence of any
injury to the de facto complainant, any empty threat will not make out a
prima facie case to attract Section
case no person has been injured and it is
only an empty threat. In view of the same, the petitioner is granted bail.
5. Taking
building of the petitioner does not arise.
Further, except for the empty threat, there have been no other action
http://www.judis
office in the building of the petitioner. Further, except for the
empty threat, there have been no other action furtherance.
12.It is seen that
unsettle the mind
of the person on whom it operates. An empty threat to kill, too
insignificant, which would not have created any impact ... facto complainant. It was
not a serious threat but an empty threat without any intention. The
petitioner was not armed with any dangerous weapon
criminal
intimidation. It is a settled principle of law that empty threats by itself
does not make out an offence of criminal intimidation unless there