Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Shri Ram Naresh Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 May, 2015 Bench

State of Punjab ), the Apex Court held that FIR is not an encyclopedia which will contain every detail of the incident. It is further held

settled principle of law that the FIR is not an encyclopedia containing all the facts. No doubt in the FIR, this fact is not mentioned

This is trite law that even FIR cannot be treated as an encyclopedia. The Apex Court in (2003) 6 SCC 175 ( Superintendent of Police ... Tapan Kumar Singh ), opined that a First Information Report is not an encyclopedia, which must disclose all facts and details relating to the offence reported

State By: Byatarayanapura Police vs A1: K.Gopal S/O K.P.Karunakaran on 23

injury to the genitals or leaving any seminal stains." 39. In Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice (Vol. 4 at page 1356, it is stated

cria413.05 40 incident. FIR is not an encyclopedia. Nor is it Examination-in-chief in advance. But the accused, however went into hairsplitting ... find that this is material. To repeat, FIR is not an encyclopedia. When the FIR mentions that Nilesh was stabbed in the chest and this

cria413.05 40 incident. FIR is not an encyclopedia. Nor is it Examination-in-chief in advance. But the accused, however went into hairsplitting ... find that this is material. To repeat, FIR is not an encyclopedia. When the FIR mentions that Nilesh was stabbed in the chest and this

cria413.05 40 incident. FIR is not an encyclopedia. Nor is it Examination-in-chief in advance. But the accused, however went into hairsplitting ... find that this is material. To repeat, FIR is not an encyclopedia. When the FIR mentions that Nilesh was stabbed in the chest and this

also well settled that the FIR is not an encyclopedia of the entire prosecution case. It is simply a report in respect of a cognizable