Kumar PW-13. He further argued that the FIR is not an encyclopedia
to give all the detailed facts in the same. He argued that ... cannot be doubted. As already discussed above, FIR is not an encyclopedia.
All the minutest details regarding the occurrence and persons are not
supposed
that FIR is not an encyclopedia of facts and it is not
expected from a victim to give details of the incident
either ... brief history given to the
doctors. FIR is not an encyclopedia which is expected to
contain all the details of the prosecution case
follows:-
"It is well settled that FIR is not an encyclopedia of the
facts concerning the crime merely because of minutest
details of occurrence ... this document
Criminal Misc. No. M-42637 of 2013 7
an encyclopedia. As rightly contended by learned counsel
for the appellant whether the accused belongs
Moreover, the FIR is not to be treated an encyclopedia of the offences
committed by the accused. It was only meant for giving information
regarding ... Moreover, the FIR was not supposed to be the encyclopedia of all
the facts. It was during the investigation, that evidence was collected
Crl. Misc
matter to the police. Suffice it to say, FIR is not an encyclopedia in the case. In the FIR, essential facts should find mention. Even
injury to the genitals or leaving any seminal stains.
39. In Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice (Vol.4) at
page 1356, it is stated
connection thereof yet the initial version is
not required to be encyclopedia of all the events. At that point of
time, facts disclosing commission
Gurleen Kaur And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 30 May, 2009
Equivalent
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Santro Devi And Ors. on 28 October, 1996
Equivalent
Harpreet Singh vs State Of Punjab on 22 May, 2019
Author: Harinder Singh Sidhu
Bench
