learned Counsel for the
Petitioners stating that the FIR is not an encyclopedia. The ingredients of
the offences are made ... learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the
FIR is not an encyclopedia and after collecting the materials by the
Investigation Officer, whether the ingredients
learned Counsel for the
Petitioners stating that the FIR is not an encyclopedia. The ingredients of
the offences are made ... learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the
FIR is not an encyclopedia and after collecting the materials by the
Investigation Officer, whether the ingredients
learned Counsel for the
Petitioners stating that the FIR is not an encyclopedia. The ingredients of
the offences are made ... learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the
FIR is not an encyclopedia and after collecting the materials by the
Investigation Officer, whether the ingredients
learned Counsel for the
Petitioners stating that the FIR is not an encyclopedia. The ingredients of
the offences are made ... learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the
FIR is not an encyclopedia and after collecting the materials by the
Investigation Officer, whether the ingredients
learned Counsel for the
Petitioners stating that the FIR is not an encyclopedia. The ingredients of
the offences are made ... learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the
FIR is not an encyclopedia and after collecting the materials by the
Investigation Officer, whether the ingredients
complaint/NCR.
It is settled legal proposition that FIR is not an encyclopedia of
the entire case. It may not and need not contain
first information report, although is neither substantive piece of evidence nor encyclopedia of the occurrence, is important step of the prosecution to initiate the criminal
investigated in depth. Further the FIR is not an encyclopedia and it need not
contain all facts and it cannot be quashed in the threshold
Appellate Court and it is not
in dispute that FIR is not encyclopedia of facts, but it is a well legal
position that this court
Anjan Das Gupta (supra) that the FIR need not be an encyclopedia,
does not help the respondents.
The next contention of Mr. Bhattacharya relates
