been made out. The respondents would
contend that FIR is not an encyclopedia and that omission to mention the
names of the petitioners herein will ... taken as an axiomatic proposition that an FIR is
not an encyclopedia and that minute details are not required to be mentioned
therein. Names originally
been made out. The respondents would
contend that FIR is not an encyclopedia and that omission to mention the
names of the petitioners herein will ... taken as an axiomatic proposition that an FIR is
not an encyclopedia and that minute details are not required to be mentioned
therein. Names originally
been made out. The respondents would
contend that FIR is not an encyclopedia and that omission to mention the
names of the petitioners herein will ... taken as an axiomatic proposition that an FIR is
not an encyclopedia and that minute details are not required to be mentioned
therein. Names originally
pass
by. Though the FIR is not supposed to an encyclopedia of the factors
concerning the crime, yet there must be some definite information
being the
witness to a horrid murder, cannot be an encyclopedia of the offence when
members of an unlawful assembly consist of 11 persons carrying
investigated in depth. Further the FIR is not an encyclopedia and it
need not contain all facts and it cannot be quashed in the threshold
counter affidavit. Law is
well settled that F.I.R. is an encyclopedia of the fact and details of the
crime are unearthed and unraveled
basis of the complaint Ex.P.1, is not an encyclopedia of all dates and events and
it is only a document, which enables ... light of settled legal position that F.I.R. is not the
encyclopedia of all dates and events and it is only a document
well settled
preposition of law that the first information is
not the encyclopedia of all the facts and
circumstances of the case. Simply because
there
intent to say that the F.I.R. is an encyclopedia which should contain all the details. But when there are multiple number of accused
