dated 12-8-1987 wherein the details of the design and engineering charges charged for these years had been given.
9. The Collector, Central Excise ... dated 12th August, 1987 wherein the details of the design and engineering Charges charged by these divisions for the years
were not design and engineering;
(3) The design and engineering charges paid to DML referred to the design and engineering of the plant in India ... included the charges for engineering and designing done by them, wherever engineering and designing was necessary; and
(5) The prices charged to the appellant
following category:
• Feasibility study
• Pre-designed services/project report
• Basic design engineering
• Detailed engineering
• Procurement
• Construction supervision and project management
• Supervision of commissioning and initial ... designing, and engineering etc. are raised, turn-key project contract is divisible and bills in respect of designing and engineering can be charged
case of discrepancies they shall be
explained and adjusted by the Engineering in Charge.
The priority of the Contract documents shall be as
follows:
Letter
statement of chemical examiner and that of Mr.
Krishan Kumar, in-charge of engineering laboratory in Vadodara unit. The
samples from Gandhar as well
received over and above the amount charged in the invoices. Therefore,
the charge of undervaluation is not sustainable. Consequently, the goods
are not liable ... Harish Engg Works is not sustainable. With regard to the three
invoices issued by M/s Mahalaxmi Engg Works, we find that the charge
Kusum Patodia, Proprietress of M/s. Venus Engineering Works
Vs.
Sales Tax Officer, Salkia Charge & Ors.
With ... Officer, N.D. Sarani Charge & Ors.
With
W.P. No. 6204 (W) of 2017
M/s. Shristi Engineering Works
Vs.
Sales Tax Officer, Durgapur
time of clearance, which has boosted the excise liability. Other than this charge, there is no evidence brought to show that both parties are intentionally ... been proved to bring them to charge. Therefore, duty paid by M/s D.C.M. Engineering Ltd. having gone into the treasury through
this Court in Collector vs. Panchmukhi Engineering Works 1, whereby
this Court held that Dharmada charged by the assessee is liable to
be included ... schemes entrusted to the Committee by the Central Government
and towards the Engineering Goods Export Assistance Fund. This
Court considered the question whether the addition
Chandigarh , 2002 (139) ELT 143 (T).
The Tribunal did not uphold the charge of clandestine removal based upon entries in worker/dyeing master ... also in the case of Laxmi Engg. Works v. CCE, Delhi , 2002 (139) ELT 573 (T) wherein the charge of clandestine manufacture and removal
