fact that it had already applied for registration of
Brand Names/Trade Marks like "SPEL", "POWERSYS",
"SEN & PANDIT ELECTRONICS ... have
been equally entitled to use the said name/ part of
name. This is especially so when the name/ mark is not
shown to have
condensate" as crude oil for the payment of
Royalty equally applicable in case of levy of oil cess on the "condensate ... seen from the letter dated 29.11.2017 the copy of
which is marked to the DG Hydrocarbon stating that the condensate
produced from SGL field
notice (s) and confirmed the demand of duty alongwith interest and imposed
equal penalty. Hence, the present appeal before the Tribunal.
2. Ld. Senior Advocate ... agreement with the Coca Cola Company, the
appellant uses the trade marks/brand names of the said company for the
goods manufactured
therefore, the price enhanced in the case of K.P.
International shall equally apply in the case of the present respondent.
Another contemporary import ... Glass
ware. In the container seized contained the impugned goods were marked
as "TREO premium glassware" whereas the inner boxes were marked
retail packets being of 6.0 gms and 7.5 gms were exempted from marking MRP, in terms of rule 34 of the standard of Weights ... duty demand raised vide show cause notice with interest and imposed equal amount of penalty. Appeal preferred by the appellant against the order in original
revisionary proceedings, the demand was confirmed along with interest and also imposed equal penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act. Aggrieved the appellants ... Order No. 42954/2017 dated 17.11.2017 has held that actual expenses with mark-up are not to be included in the taxable value of services
contest.
Through the said order-in-original, the demand was confirmed and equal
penalty was imposed. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant preferred ... appellant has submitted that M/s BASANT was a trade mark registered in
1970 by the Grandfather of Proprietor Shri Gurdeep Singh. The appellant
firm
Notification no. 08/2003-CE was denied. Further, interest
was demanded and equal amount of penalty was imposed under Section 11 AC
read with Rule ... certificate of
registration granted by the appropriate authority under the Trade Marks Act, 1999
bearing trademark no. 806030 dated 15/10/1998
Micronised Progesterone and marketed the same under the brand name/ house mark as Sugest. The product in question is in the market for a number ... case. He has not only proceeded on wrong presumption but also imposed equal penalty without giving any reasons as to how the appellant attracts equal
M/S. Maharashtra Aldehydes &Amp; ... vs Cce Raigad on 19 November, 2018
IN THE
