2020]
equal level and accordingly, equal marks were allocated to each
question.
16. Learned counsel appearing for interveners submitted that the
revision of the result ... questions included in the question paper were of
equal level and were carrying equal marks and, therefore, while
attempting the question paper all the candidates
marks
out of 1460 marks in aggregate, having secured 750
marks out of 1300 marks in the written examination and
87 marks ... secured less marks in interview i.e.,
87 marks out of 160 marks, therefore, on the basis of
higher marks obtained in the interview, name
appellant were equal to them.
7. Being aggrieved of the assignment of serial No.60 despite
having secured equal marks, the appellant preferred a writ ... marks in written examination should be given
priority and in the event of both the date of birth and marks in
written examination being equal
called for interview.
Explanation- In case of candidates securing equal
marks in written examination, the candidate(s) elder
in age shall be called for interview ... marks in written test and interview, preference
shall be given to the candidate securing more
marks in interview.
(ii) In case of candidates securing equal
other mean to determine the
merit between the two candidates having equal
marks and also could not make good his challenge
to the said Circular ... appellate authority, the writ petitioner
and Minakshi have got equal marks. Since, Minakshi was of more
age than the petitioner, the respondents have selected Minakshi
criteria for
preparing the merit list of the candidates who obtained equal
marks had been determined by the Department of Personnel.
Earlier a writ petition ... averment that he as well as the private respondents had obtained
equal marks but the private respondents have been placed at a
(Downloaded
question paper given during the
examination, contained 150 questions of equal marks - 30
questions from each of the five subjects.
5. It was the contention ... marks too spiked to 116,
which was 104 marks earlier.
14. Heard.
15. Concededly, after the revision of result, marks of petitioners
Rules
of 2008. It is also submitted that candidates who secured
equal marks in the interview, the select list in the
descending order of their
that trade test should consist of 20 marks
instead of 50 marks. The trade test for 30 marks
should not have been made applicable ... procedure of
selection. Further the respondents have
fixed minimum and maximum marks
equality in trade test / interview as 30 & 20
respectively and declared
their aggregate
marks. If two or more of such candidates
obtain equal marks in the aggregate the
Commission shall arrange them in order of
merit
