four
percent marks
(ii) Personality Assessment upto three
percent marks
(iii) Power of Expression upto three per
cent marks
Note- The total marks obtained ... Knowledge Upto four marks
(ii) Personality Assessment Upto three marks
(iii) Power of Expression Upto three marks
Note:- The total marks obtained by a candidate
prepared subjectwise and groupwise respectively. If two or more candidates obtain equal marks in interview, the name of the candidate who has higher quality points ... marks obtained in the interview as well as the quality points of two or more candidates are equal, the name of the candidate
marks calculated by applying "Linear Standard Score Method" would result in scaled scores or scaled marks and cannot be considered to be marks ... they consider fit for appointment. If two or more candidates obtain equal marks in the aggregate, the name of the candidate obtained higher marks
them in the written test. If two or more candidates obtain equal marks, the selection committee shall arrange their names in order of merit
marks on the basis of subject/general knowledge;
(ii) 3 per cent marks on the basis of personality;and
(iii) 3 per cent marks ... wise and group-wise respectively. If two or more candidates obtain equal marks, the name of candidate who has higher quality points shall be placed
further held that for seeking preference one must have equal marks and then only one can claim preference amongst the candidates, who are otherwise equal ... will mean that the candidates concerned will have to have equal marks to begin with and then one amongst so many, will be given
interview and driving test. If two or more candidates obtain equal marks, the Selection Committee shall arrange their names in order of merit
petitioner was a candidate plain cadre. He secured total 599 marks in written examination and interview and Ms Shriddhci katiyar was recommended at serial ... petitioner's name was not recommended though he had secured equal marks along with Sri Anil Kumar. The said Anil Kumar who had secured
merit as the petitioner along with some other candidates secured equal marks. In pursuance of his selection in waiting list, the petitioner was issued
Rasulpur.
5. It appears that petitioner and respondent No. 6 obtained equal marks but petitioner suspected that the marks of Intermediate examination of respondent
