validity
which applies by virtue of Section 31(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999
["TM Act"] and thus the same being liable ... Equally untrue, prima facie, is the statement, in para 32 of the
plaint, that the plaintiff came to know of the defendants‟
PANTOPACID mark
against
and by such fees as may be prescribed."
23. Of equal significance are the provisions enshrined in Sections ... Court.--
(1) No suit--
(a) for the infringement of a registered trade mark; or
(b) relating to any right in a registered trade mark
Bolt Technology Ou vs Ujoy Technology Private Limited & Anr. on 30 November, 2023
Author
Commissioner (Food Safety), Gnctd vs Sugandhi Snuff King Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. on 10 April
Gujarat Jhm Hotels Ltd vs Rajasthali Resorts And Studios Limited on 17 January, 2023
Author
M/S Prakash Industries Limited vs Union Of India And Anr. on 24 January, 2023
Theme Engineering Services Pvt Ltd. & ... vs National Highways Authority Of India & ... on 23
Arcelormittal India Pvt Ltd vs Jsc Ogcc Kazstroyservice on 30 May, 2023
Author: Yashwant Varma
Union Of India vs Sugandhi Snuff King Pvt Ltd & Ors. on 10 April, 2023
Nidhi Kapoor vs Principal Commissioner And Additional ... on 21 August, 2023
Author: Dharmesh Sharma
Bench
