which the petitioner and
respondent No.5 got equal marks i.e. 151 out of 200. It is relevant
to mention here that in Part ... examination also the petitioner
and respondent No.5 secured equal marks. Though the petitioner
3
as well as respondent No.5 secured equal marks
rational and
basis for depriving the reserved category candidate
securing equal or more marks qua general category
candidates from securing birth as U.R. candidate
Rules reveals that in case two or more
candidates obtain equal marks then the merit has to be
decided firstly on the basis of marks ... kept higher in merit. However, if both the candidates
secured equal marks even in part "B" of the question paper
then the candidates
that the petitioner as well as respondent no.5
had scored equal marks, i.e. 50 whereas another candidate namely Gudiya
Kacher had scored ... petitioner as well
as the respondent no.5 were awarded equal marks, i.e. 50. However by
referring to column 6 of comparative chart, annexure
marks) and marks secured for weightage to rural/tribal area service (equivalent to maximum of 50 marks) thus a total of 250 marks ... case of two or more candidates obtaining equal marks, the inter se merit will be decided as per procedure described in sub-rule
instead of respondent No.4 because both of them had
obtained equal marks in the final marking.
As against this, learned counsel for respondent ... then total marks obtained in all the papers shall be
taken into consideration.
(iii) If marks of written examination are also equal
then the candidate
posts
advertised, in addition to the number of
candidates securing marks equal to the last
candidate so counted, provided that number
of qualified candidates ... candidates for one vacancy plus such
additional candidates who have secured marks equal to
the last candidate on the basis of the ratio aforementioned
subject
posts
advertised, in addition to the number of
candidates securing marks equal to the last
candidate so counted, provided that number
of qualified candidates ... candidates for one vacancy plus such
additional candidates who have secured marks equal to
the last candidate on the basis of the ratio aforementioned
subject
posts
advertised, in addition to the number of
candidates securing marks equal to the last
candidate so counted, provided that number
of qualified candidates ... candidates for one vacancy plus such
additional candidates who have secured marks equal to
the last candidate on the basis of the ratio aforementioned
subject
posts
advertised, in addition to the number of
candidates securing marks equal to the last
candidate so counted, provided that number
of qualified candidates ... candidates for one vacancy plus such
additional candidates who have secured marks equal to
the last candidate on the basis of the ratio aforementioned
subject
