plaintiff in the instant case before me because there was no assignment of the claim or of the title to the goods.
13. The next ... further held that Section 135A(2) is based on the equitable principles of reimbursement laid down in Section 69 of the Indian Contract
drawn to the
assignment deed dated 20.04.2005. Submission being that this was not a
valid assignment; being only an agreement to assign; the whole case ... valid
assignment in his favour, the suit would not be maintainable. The
judgment debtor learnt about this fraudulent assignment deed only when
defendant
K. Kallaiah vs Ningegowda on 13 April, 1981
Equivalent citations: AIR1982KANT93, ILR1981KAR819, 1981(2)KARLJ11
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Steel Authority Of India Limited on 17 September
Chockalingam Chettiar vs Meyappa Chettiar And Ors. on 28 January, 1938
Equivalent citations: (1938)2MLJ287
Deepchand Mini vs Ticamchand Mini on 12 June, 1973
Equivalent citations: AIR1974CAL222, 78CWN478, AIR 1974
Yadavalli Suryakanthamma And Anr. vs Maddipatla Dorayya And Anr. on 9 November, 1964
Equivalent citations
The Madras Consolidated Sugar And ... vs William Sissmore Shaw And Ors. on 22 December, 1903
M/S Super Auto Pvt.Ltd. vs Protyush Chatterjee & Anr on 11 April, 2011
M.Kamalakannan vs M.Manikandan on 21 June, 2011
Author: G. Rajasuria
Bench: G. Rajasuria
