being able to maintain the
legitimate claim of equitable set off; the set off was in relation to the dues
payable ... held that, in so far as set-off and counter-claim is
concerned, a set-off of amounts due from financial creditors is a rarity
higher utilization of coal due to increased
SHR because of lower off take of power by the Respondent
No.1?
5. Relief Sought
In view ... prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to:
(a) Set aside the Impugned Order passed by the Respondent
No. 2 Commission dated
fact, applied the terms of the PPA in a
reasonable, sound and equitable manner.
(v). It is, in fact, the Generator who has suffered
financially ... from 29.12.2012
to 1.2.2013 on account of GETCO's failure to
set up the transmission facilities.
(vi). The Appellant has for the period
Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory ... on 28 January, 2021
IN
Pel Power Limited vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 19 May, 2020
Appeal No.266 of
fact, applied the terms of the PPA in a reasonable, sound and equitable manner. It
is, in fact, respondent no. 2 who has suffered financially ... March, 2012 on account
of GETCO's failure to set up the transmission facilities. The appellant has for the
period October, 2011 to March
Siel Limited vs The Punjab State Electricity ... on 26 May, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2006ELR(APTEL
Ajmer Vidyut Viteran Nigam Ltd. vs Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory ... on 9 May, 2008
JUDGMENT
Manju
Tamil Nadu Electricity Consumers’ ... vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Board & Ors on 28 July, 2011
Torrent Power Limited Torrent House Off ... vs Gujarat Electricity Regulatory ... on 23 March, 2010
Before
