Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.65 seconds)

M.B.Sruthi vs Unknown on 25 July, 2018

consummated on account of fact that the respondent suffered from erectile dysfunction, therefore, he could not consummate the marriage. The statement of the respondent that ... petitioner's blood. But the respondent suffers from erectile dysfunction and could not have sexual intercourse with the petitioner. The claim of the respondent
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P Velmurugan - Full Document

M. Pradeepkumar @ Saravanan vs P. Subbu

another 30% disability for incontinence of Urine, Urinary infection and erectile dysfunction. Thus, taking the total disability of the claimant at 60%, the period ... artificially clamped to his penis, which has resulted in erectile dysfunction. The learned counsel for the appellant also contended that the appellant/claimant requires continued
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R Subbiah - Full Document

S.Raju vs State Through on 31 July, 2025

that the appellant / accused could not have raped as he had erectile dysfunction. Despite the same, PW9 Doctor has given opinion that the appellant / accused ... further asked what is the reason. The Doctor has stated that the erectile function of a person may change in accordance with the situation
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1