produced by him;
(ii) Mistake or error apparent on the face of the record;
(iii) Any other sufficient reason.
The words, "any other sufficient ... cannot be a ground for review.
(vii)The error apparent on the face of the record should not be an error which
very limited, viz., confined strictly to 'Error Apparent on the Face of Record'. Indeed, the 'Review Proceedings' cannot be equated with ... Review' does not lie where there is no error apparent on the face of record. To put it succinctly, a decision / order erroneous
suffers from an 'Apparent Error on the Face of Record'. The Learned Counsel for the Applicant contends that the 2nd Respondent / Transport Corporation ... coming to the conclusion that there was no Error Apparent on the face of Record. In fact, the Learned Single Judge while dismissing the Review
suffers from an 'Apparent Error on the Face of Record'. The Learned Counsel for the Applicant contends that the 2nd Respondent / Transport Corporation ... coming to the conclusion that there was no Error Apparent on the face of Record. In fact, the Learned Single Judge while dismissing the Review
suffers from an 'Error Apparent on the Face of Record'.
3. The Learned Special Government Pleader for the Applicants contends that the Respondent ... process of reasoning cannot be termed as an 'Error Apparent on the Face of Record, justifying a 'Court of Law' to exercise
lies only on the ground of mistake or error apparent on the face of record or for any other sufficient reason. In the absence ... error apparent on the face of record, an order cannot be disturbed. Moreover, if an order was passed in a real and correct perspective, there
incorrect finding, opposed to facts and therefore an error apparent on the face of record, in the Judgment had crept in, which needs ... Review' does not lie where there is no error apparent on the face of record. If there is no patent error involved, a Review
incorrect finding, opposed to facts and therefore an error apparent on the face of record, in the Judgment had crept in, which needs ... Review' does not lie where there is no error apparent on the face of record. If there is no patent error involved, a Review
incorrect finding, opposed to facts and therefore an error apparent on the face of record, in the Judgment had crept in, which needs ... Review' does not lie where there is no error apparent on the face of record. If there is no patent error involved, a Review
V.Rajesh Kannan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 20 December, 2017
Bench: M
