adequately all cases of errors which can be
appropriately described as errors of law apparent on the
face of the record. Whether ... impugned error is
an error of law and an error of law which is apparent on
the face of the record, must always depend upon
adequately all cases of errors which
can be appropriately described as errors of law apparent
on the face of the record. Whether ... impugned
error is an error of law and an error of law which is
apparent on the face of the record, must always depend
upon
adequately
all cases of errors which can be appropriately
described as errors of law apparent on the face of
the record. Whether ... impugned error is
an error of law and an error of law which is
apparent on the face of the record, must always
depend upon
adequately all cases of errors which can be appropriately
described as errors of law apparent on the face of the
record. Whether ... impugned error is an error of
law and an error of law which is apparent on the face of
the record, must always depend upon
define or adequately
describe what an error of law apparent on the face of
the record means. What can be corrected by a writ ... impugned error is an error of law
and an error of law which is apparent on the face of the
record, must always depend upon
adequately all cases of errors which can be
appropriately described as errors of law apparent on the
face of the record. Whether ... impugned error is
an error of law and an error of law which is apparent on
the face of the record, must always depend upon
ground of some mistake
or error apparent on the face of the record or for any other sufficient
reason.
16. In the case of Thungabhadra ... substantial
question of law is an "error apparent on the face of
the record". The fact that on the earlier occasion
the Court
consent order dated 14.02.2019
suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record. The first and
the foremost being that even though this ... months, which it is
contended is an error apparent on the face of the record, warranting
review of the order.
4. The second submission
rejected by observing that
there was no error apparent on the face of the record. We are unable
to appreciate as to how a blatant ... mode, cannot fall
within the ambit of an error apparent on the face of the record. In
our view, the Tribunal ought to have corrected
statutory
presumption can be rebutted on the basis of material on record. There is
no dispute with this proposition of law. However, I find that ... matter.
That is to say, unless there is palpable error apparent on the face of
record, the concurrent findings of the courts below
