before the Supreme Court. In 19.17, when the war was on, the Espionage Act was passed. The constitutionality of this Act was brought before ... Congress to declare criminal the violation of the prohibitions contained in the Espionage Act of 1917 as amended by the Sedition Act of 1918. When
Constitution for over anti-national activities such as sabotage,
espionage, etc. or for misconduct, insolvency, inefficiency not
due to age or failure to pass ... proviso C to Article 311(2) for anti-national activities as
sabotage, espionage etc. for misconduct. This provision cannot possibly be
made applicable
others, (1998) 5 Supreme Court Cases 223 famously known as
"ISRO Espionage Case" has again dealt with somewhat similar
issue. Here also
Ram Kumar Ranga vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 15 July, 2019
Author: Harsimran
provisio C to Article 311
(2) for anti national activities as sabotage, espionage etc. for misconduct.
This provision cannot possibly be made applicable
Article 311(2) for anti-national activities such as sabotage, espionage etc. or for misconduct. Naturally, under such circumstances, there would be forfeiture of past
financial help given by the Portuguese authorities you are carrying on espionage on behalf of the Portuguese Government with the help of underground workers
Constitution for over anti-national activities such as sabotage, espionage etc. or for misconduct, insolvency, inefficiency not due to age or failure to pass
officers claimed that they always had intention to escape and had
advised espionage party sent out to do likewise. This noting is by
Brigadier
Constitution for over anti-
national activities such as sabotage, espionage etc. or for misconduct,
insolvency, inefficiency not due to age or failure to pass