Search Results Page

Search Results

51 - 60 of 2550 (1.44 seconds)

Teepa @ Surendra vs State Of M.P. on 6 August, 2014

whereby the petitioner has been convicted under Section 3 / 7 of Essential Commodities Act and sentenced to undergo 1 year's RI with fine ... violation of any "order" regarding any essential commodity, then the provisions of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 may apply. This Court in the matter
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Shiv Kumar vs State Of M.P. on 20 May, 2005

Appellant has been convicted under Section 3 / 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for violating the provision of Section ... scheme is not covered under Section 3 / 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and for that appellant can not be punished by jail sentence
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
Previous   2 3 4 5 6   7 8 9 10 11 Next