Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

root of all evil. The petitioner has made a vain attempt to put the wool in the eyes of law and in the Members

Kamlesh Rani vs Dlf Homes on 29 August, 2017 Daily Order STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

week of September. According to us, all these explanations are only to eye wash the mind of this Commission.   In Basawaraj ... grounds. 'A result flowing from a statutory provision is never an evil. A Court has no power to ignore that provision to relieve what

State Commission. According to us, all these explanations are only to eye wash the mind of this Commission without any basis. In Basawaraj ... grounds. 'A result flowing from a statutory provision is never an evil. A Court has no power to ignore that provision to relieve what

rights of a person or which may visit such person with evil consequences. The rule that no man can be condemned unheard has been treated ... checking, therefore, the demand notice cannot be sustained in the eye of law and deserved to be set aside. 18. The submission of the learned

Rakesh K. Dhawan vs Union Of India on 27 May, 2008 IN THE STATE COMMISSION

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Shri Mohanlal Agarwalla. on 18 January, 2003 IN THE STATE

Smt.P.Vasundara vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 29 January, 2008 DISTRICT CONSUMER

R.K Nolini Devi vs Dr. Sharatkumar And Others on 5 May, 2017 BEFORE THE

Smt. Sangeeta Dubey vs Dr. Suneeta Verma & Ors on 8 April, 2015 CHHATTISGARH STATE