Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

particular law would be done "not with an evil eye and unequal hand". (see A. Thangal Kunju Musaliar v. M. Venkatichalam Potti

treating and harassing her except stating that he had an evil eye against her. Just looking at a lady with an evil eye cannot

accused used to come to the kitchen and he casted an evil eye on her and he was asking her for sexual acts. The learned

that accused No.1 has been following her and had an evil eye on her. He had disclosed that he fell in love with this

front of the house of the complainant, used to have an evil eye on the wife of the complainant. The accused-petitioner during the absence

allegations in the complaint, petitioner was teasing her and keeping an evil eye on her and making sexual gestures, the further details

during the absence of the complainant in his house, kept an evil eye on the complainant's wife and he was virtually inciting

fully supports the case of prosecution. They are the eye witnesses to the incident in question. Though the defence has come with the explanation that ... more particularly when accused No.2 sustained certain injuries near her left eye, we find that the trial Court is justified while accepting other portion

rule that a Police Officer can or cannot be a sole eye- witness in a criminal case. It will always 20 depend upon the facts ... Supreme Court has held that - 21 A social evil and offence i.e., Section 395 of I.P.C. dacoity out of zeal the trial

High Court Of Karnataka vs Syed Mohammed Ibrahim on 17 December, 2014 Bench: N.Kumar