Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 58 (0.95 seconds)

Unknown vs State Of Haryana on 19 September, 2022

fire crackers (explosives substance) at Shop no. C­21, Sidarth Nagar, New Delhi without license and permit in contravention of Explosives Rules, 2008. 9. Before ... prohibited under The Explosives Act, 1884 . 10. Section 9B of the said Act prohibits possession of explosives in contravention of the rules made under section
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Raj Kumar on 19 October, 2012

termed as rash and negligent act while dealing withe explosive substances. In this circumstances no offence under section 286 IPC is made out against ... under section 9 B of Explosive Act. The rule 128, of Explosive rules 2008 framed under the Explosive Act , specifically authorizes police officials not below
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sivakumar M.P vs District Collector on 8 October, 2010

petitioner applied for renewal of explosive licence. This has been rejected stating that registration of Crime No.442/2012 against the petitioner for offences under ... court. The petitioner draws to attention of Rule 118 of the Explosives Rule 2008 which reads as follows: "118. Suspension and revocation or cancellation
Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Munna Lal on 8 January, 2013

section 286 IPC is the rash and negligent act while dealing with explosives substances. The term rash and negligent act in the context of driving ... under section 9 B of Explosive Act. The rule 128, of Explosive rules 2008 framed under the FIR No. 524/04 5/7 STATE
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next