employees of the 1st petitioner-company being the General Manager and the Export Officer respectively, wherein the said company is engaged in processing food products ... wherein the said company was said to be processing mangoes and tomatoes into pulp and exporting to foreign countries and the said produce is notified
manufacturing facility of
respondent No.1 company to manufacture
mango pulp for export of the same by the
company in liquidation through its export
division
process Totapuri
C.M.P.No.300/2016
-3-
Mango dices for being marketed and exported to its
customers all over the world. The respondent ... contended that the respondent delayed the process of
unloading the mangoes supplied by the petitioner and further
insisted on rejections amounting
MARKETING
(REGULATION)
SRINIVASAPURA TALUK
SRINIVASAPURA.
21. THE SECRETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING YARD
(MANGO)
KALASIPALYA (BYATARAYANAPURA)
BANGALORE.
22. MILANSAR MANGAO CENTER
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR
MUZAMIL ... FIELD, HOSKOTE HIGHWAY
BANGALORE- 560 067.
25. AGRICULTURAL & PROCESSED FOOD
PRODUCTS EXPORT
BY ITS DIRECTOR/NODAL OFFICER
(MINISTRY OF COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Sufal Mango Growers Association ... vs Managing Director on 8 April, 2013
Author: Dilip B.Bhosale
Bench: Dilip B. Bhosale
1
IN THE HIGH COURT ... 76370/2013:
BETWEEN:
1. M/S SUFAL MANGO GROWERS ASSOCIATION (REGD),
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.71, 15TH
CROSS, LINGARAJ NAGAR (N) ,HUBLI
Sri R Shankaran vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 July, 2014
Author: Anand Byrareddy
Lipton India Limited And Another vs State Of Karnataka And Others on 13 June, 1994
Mohan vs State Of Karnataka on 7 March, 1986
Equivalent citations: ILR1986KAR1924
ORDER
K.A
High Court Of Karnataka vs Syed Mohammed Ibrahim on 17 December, 2014
Bench: N.Kumar
Selvi J.Jayalalitha vs State, By The Superintendent Of Police on 11 May, 2015
Author
