Investigation v. V. Vijay Sai
Reddy [4] wherein the learned Judges have expressed thus: -
“28. While granting bail, the court has to keep in mind ... conditions for grant of bail
on such surrender. When the High Court in categorical terms has
expressed the view that it is not inclined
offence. Then P.W. 30 took the accused, who expressed his readiness to surrender before the police, to the office of the Commissioner of Police
accused surrendered before PW30. It is alleged that the accused expressed his willingness to discover the article (stick). He alleged to have led the Police
Respondent
No.1 shall surrender and be taken into custody as already directed in
paragraph 39 above. We have not expressed any opinion either
directed to surrender
forthwith. The bail application is disposed of accordingly.
16. Nothing stated hereinabove shall tantamount to the expression of
any opinion
deciding the present
appeals and shall not be construed as an expression of the final opinion in the
pending criminal appeals before the High Court ... High Court is hereby set aside.
40. The convicts are ordered to surrender before the Trial Court within a
period of three days from today
Raghav Prapanna Tripathi vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 4 May, 1962
Equivalent citations
expressing any
views on merit, we set aside the impugned order of the High Court
dated 28.01.2021 and direct the RespondentÂAccused to surrender
before
permitted, to avoid arrest by the police by a simple device of surrender in the Court. Any practice which permits such a course is contrary ... accused were wanted by the police in a murder case. They surrendered before the Magistrate. The Magistrate took them into custody. After a week
none in the Math had committed an offence and none could be surrendered. But no police officer replied and stated to Pagla Baba that ... matter should be amicably settled & the wanted persons and weapons surrendered without any unpleasantness as the place was a seat of religion where they
