held that the compensation would mean a just equivalent of what the expropriated owner had been deprived of. Further, the question of adequacy was also ... right to compensation i.e. equivalent in money of the property expropriated. The Supreme Court proceeded to interpret the concept of compensation provided under Article
property if a law is passed which has the effect of expropriating him. But Sir Tej Bahadur does not accept this interpretation; he says that ... that is required according to these authorities is that the intention to expropriate must appear either expressly or by clear implication. For the purpose
Legislature itself. It is Prohibited from making a law authorising expropriation except for public purposes and on payment of compensation for the injury sustained ... particular extent. (f) The provisions of the Act do not authorise expropriation of the property.
26. It seems to us that in view
creation of a new relation of landlord and tenant arising from expropriation would be apparently as much within the scope of that Act, whether such ... expropriation arose through voluntary partition, or through sale or execution proceedings. In the same way the Land Revenue Act in its provisions in respect
property in its actual condition at the time of expropriation with all its existing advantages and with all its possibilities, excluding any advantage ... property in its actual condition at the time of its expropriations with all its existing advantages and with all its possibilities, excluding any advantage
been pointed out that the State cannot be permitted to expropriate the property of a citizen if the award has been made and the necessary ... Section 24(2) is that the State has no business to expropriate from a citizen his property if an award has been made
State, whenever the public interest requires it. The term 'expropriation' is practically synonymous with the term 'eminent domain ... sovereign power of eminent domain is exercised by the State and property expropriated. No abstract principles could be laid. Each case must be considered
Managers Prem Chand, Durga Prasad, Lakshy Kumar Tanwar etc.; the conspiracy to expropriate money was hatched in a planned manner with involvement of Branch Manager ... Kumar Tanwar, Prem Chand, Durga Prasad, Smt. Alka Rani, Naresh Kumar Bagga expropriated the money; the loan account was then shown as NPA (Non-Profiting
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. vs Mukhtar Singh And Ors. on 8 March, 1957
purpose; the grave hardship that may be caused to him by such expropriation, availability of alternative land for achieving public purpose etc. Moreover, right conferred
