Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.75 seconds)

M/S Pushpanjali Buildcon India Private ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others on 16 October, 2025

petitioner did not pay the External Development Charges because the development authorities did not carry out any external development. If the development authority were ... Development Charges. As to the external development, he would contend that the development authority has carried out external development. In any case, payment of External
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S D Singh - Full Document

M/S Neel Padam Builders vs Mathura Vrindavan Development ... on 24 March, 2023

Petitioner :- M/S Neel Padam Builders Respondent :- Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Dharmendra Singh Chauhan ... Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 with respect to external development charges, has remained pending. However, efforts are being made to recover the amount
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1