that though the genesis of the incident is alleged to be
extortion calls made to PW18 but very strangely prosecution miserably failed to
bring forth ... details regarding those extortion calls nor it could connect the
appellant with any of those calls or mobile numbers or phones by which any
ransom
cards on the basis of forged
documents and from which extortion calls were made to various
persons.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that ... helped in activating the SIM card from
which the extortion call was made but there is no allegation that
the petitioner was party
Dharampal Dagar (PW6) informed that accused Rajesh Bawania
@ Karambir had made extortion call to him some time before the
incident and further, coaccused persons ... Dwarka Courts after their
arrest. Further, he denied the suggestion regarding extortion
call made by accused Rajesh Bawania @ Karambir.
9. Another material witness Dharampal Dagar
evidence.
PW1 namely Sh. Dalip who had allegedly received the extortion calls,
entered into witness box and deposed that he had received threatening calls ... brother Sh. Dalip Kumar (PW1) that he had
received extortion call and also that his brother had received similar call even
time of apprehension, the mobile chips used for
making extortion calls were also recovered from the
possession of accused persons.
D. It is not appreciated ... were identified correctly
by PW3 who also provided the details of extortion calls; and
E. That the judgment impugned ignores the CDRs of both
mobile
involvement
in the aforementioned extortion racket. Consequent thereto,
Vishal Vashishth was arrested and his disclosure statement recorded,
following whereupon the extortion money was recovered from ... Police authorities, (i) the mobile phone containing recording of the
extortion calls, (ii) a spy camera containing audio and video
recordings of the conversation between
attracted.
Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code prescribes
punishment for "extortion" which is defined under section 383 of
the Indian Penal Code ... sealed which may be converted into a valuable security is called
30
"extortion". It is required to be proved that the victim
deceased-accused No.3 with a common intention to
commit the offence, called the complainant-PW1 over
phone on 19.09.2009 at 5.00 pm, asking ... appellants that there was no recovery
of the so called extorted money of Rs.35,000/- and it
has falsified commission of the offence
attribution
against the petitioner. Besides, the mobile number from which the extortion
calls were made also does not belong to the petitioner and no recovery ... threaten the son of the complainant in
order to extort and the call in question was also made by the other co-
accused. He further
2019 13:45:43 :::
seemaky 7-ba-1931-2016.odt
extortion calls from one "Vikram Thakur". The accused demanded
amount ... crores, and further made the complainant and
his son to settle for extortion amount of Rs. 2 crores. The
informant was threatened that in case
