another complainant came to police station stating that he also
received extortion call from Mobile No. 8448343324 on
18.10.2019 and 9899316782. The CDR of alleged ... counsel for the petitioner that as per
the prosecution, the extortion calls were made from Tihar Jail so
the mobile phones are to be recovered
another complainant came to police station stating that he also
received extortion call from Mobile No. 8448343324 on
18.10.2019 and 9899316782. The CDR of alleged ... counsel for the petitioner that as per
the prosecution, the extortion calls were made from Tihar Jail so
the mobile phones are to be recovered
Mumbai.
(b) In the month of February 2009, complainant received
threatening call for extortion from international
phone number on his mobile. On 25th August ... failed to deliver the same. He continuously
received threatening calls for extortion and messages
from organized crime syndicate members. The caller
claimed to be Kumar
practicing fraud on the complainant,
prepared a video and made some extortion calls over mobile
phone. Initial investigation of the case was conducted by
Police ... 1078/2020 & 6173 of 2020
-11-
first installment of the extortion amount.
29. The statement of complainant, Shri Harbhajan
Singh was recorded under Section
when the complainant came back
to India, he started receiving extortion calls from unknown numbers for
Rs.20,00,000/-, whereafter he registered a Sanha
next day, a similar call was received from
Phone No.9899419447, 9870278925 wherein, the called asked him to
make a call from the WhatsApp ... cheaters who by creating false
complaints and distorted reports are making extortion calls to the
complainant, the police was requested to register an FIR against
deceased-accused No.3 with a common intention to
commit the offence, called the complainant-PW1 over
phone on 19.09.2009 at 5.00 pm, asking ... appellants that there was no recovery
of the so called extorted money of Rs.35,000/- and it
has falsified commission of the offence
settlement. Thereafter, he repeatedly called and threatened
the complainant. The threats were continued even after
registration of First Information Report. Calls from diferent
places were ... person who called
the complainant and the Applicant. The CDR is not on record to
show that, the Applicant gave calls of extortion. The calls
accused) and complainant, it is established that the alleged calls were made
to extort money by extending threat to kill complainant and his family
members ... view the serious allegations of extortion and threat against
petitioner and the fact that before making extortion call to complainant, they
were not known
that a sum
of Rs. 20,000/- was demanded as an extortion money from him
through Mobile No. 8002834119. Petitioner is not named ... owner of the said mobile by
which the alleged extortion call was made to the informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that
