Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 99 (0.83 seconds)

State vs 1. Rajesh Sharma on 15 July, 2011

relevant facts, material and evidence have been considered by the Sanctioning Authority. Consideration implies application of mind. The order of sanction must ex facie disclose ... discretion should be shown to have not been affected by any extraneous consideration. If it is shown that the sanctioning authority was unable to apply
Delhi District Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ravinder Singh on 31 March, 2011

relevant facts, material and evidence have been considered by the Sanctioning Authority. Consideration implies application of mind. The order of sanction must ex facie disclose ... discretion should be shown to have not been affected by any extraneous consideration. If it is shown that the sanctioning authority was unable to apply
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Devraj on 31 October, 2011

Devraj etc. Page No. 11/ considered by the Sanctioning Authority. Consideration implies application of mind. The order of sanction must ex facie disclose that ... discretion should be shown to have not been affected by any extraneous consideration. If it is shown that the sanctioning authority was unable to apply
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Beer Singh on 10 June, 2011

relevant facts, material and evidence have been considered by the Sanctioning Authority. Consideration implies application of mind. The order of sanction State Vs. Beer Singh ... discretion should be shown to have not been affected by any extraneous consideration. If it is shown that the sanctioning authority was unable to apply
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Inderaj Singh on 31 May, 2011

relevant facts, material and evidence have been considered by the Sanctioning Authority. Consideration implies application of mind. The order of sanction must ex facie disclose ... discretion should be shown to have not been affected by any extraneous consideration. If it is shown that the sanctioning authority was unable to apply
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Chuttan Lal Meena on 30 April, 2011

relevant facts, material and evidence have been considered by the Sanctioning Authority. Consideration implies application of mind. The order of sanction must ex facie disclose ... discretion should be shown to have not been affected by any extraneous consideration. If it is shown that the sanctioning authority was unable to apply
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Arun Sehrawat on 30 April, 2011

relevant facts, material and evidence have been considered by the Sanctioning Authority. Consideration implies application of mind. The order of sanction must ex facie disclose ... discretion should be shown to have not been affected by any extraneous consideration. If it is shown that the sanctioning authority was unable to apply
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next