Kalu @ Rajvir @ Rinku vs State on 9 May, 2018
Author: C. Hari Shankar
Bench: S
Ashok Kumar Singh Chandel vs State Of U.P. on 4 November, 2022
Author: Chief
State Of M.P. vs Dinesh Singh Yadav on 31 October, 2022
Author: Gurpal Singh
learned counsel for the appellants, submitted
that the evidence of eyewitnesses was not reliable. Rajendra Kumar
(PW-1) and Kaluram (PW-4), respectively, were ... They being close relations of the deceased, their evidence
was not reliable. Independent eyewitnesses did not support the
prosecution case and did not explain
Pappu. Adequacy or absence of
alleged motive has no significance where reliable
eyewitnesses' account is available."
12. Strong reliance has been placed
reflect upon the
credibility of a witness proved to be a reliable
eyewitness. Evidence as to motive would, no doubt,
go a long
appellants have been falsely implicated in this offence.
There is no reliable eyewitness to the incident. The trial
court relied upon the testimony
prosecution had been proved, and that there was direct evidence of eyewitnesses proving that the murder had been committed by the appellant. He also held ... deceased because he was a police informer. In the absence of reliable eyewitnesses, however, the aforesaid evidence with regard to motive would rather
ground that learned trial court did not find statements of eyewitnesses
reliable regarding other co-accused their statement can not be discarded
against present appellant
motive' has no relevance in a case where there is eyewitness account of the incident. Hon'ble Apex Court in a catena ... successfully proved its case with the help of reliable eyewitnesses.
In the case of Sanjeev Versus State of Haryana