eyewitnesses did not inspire confidence because of the difficulty to separate grain from the chaff or truth from the falsehood, discarded the eyewitnesses testimony ... eyewitnesses to establish its case against the accused persons and the evidence of the eyewitnesses clearly implicates the accused persons and their testimony
reliable and convincing testimony of the injured-complainant PW2 and well supported by the testimony of the other eyewitnesses and the medical evidence. Merely because ... that faulty investigation could hardly be a ground for rejection of testimony of eyewitnesses which had a ring of truth in it. In fact
that PWs.2 to
4 were eyewitnesses, he submits that these
were interested parties and as such, their
testimony ought not to have been accepted
court. One eyewitness does not disclose the presence of
another eyewitness. This omission raises serious doubt on
the acceptability of the testimony and the presence ... eyewitnesses, with P.W.4
being an injured eyewitness who sustained grievous
injuries. PWs.1, 2, 3 and 7 witnessed both incidents.
All the eyewitnesses
prosecution.
(v) It is his further submission that the testimony
of the eyewitnesses is not trustworthy and reliable. As
per the case of the prosecution ... hand and those where it relies
upon the testimony of eyewitnesses
on the other. In the former category of
cases proof of motive is given
that states that there
cannot be any conviction on the testimony of a
sole eyewitness, unless that the Court is of the
view that ... testimony of such sole eyewitness
is not reliable. Though generally it is a rule of
prudence followed by the courts that a conviction
regarding occurrence is believed, the testimony of
PW.4 that he was also an eyewitness to the incident
from the inception stands utterly falsified ... vicinity at the time
of occurrence, therefore, the testimony given by these
witnesses as eyewitnesses to the incident cannot be
accepted.
(v) According
main reasons for acquitting the accused are
that the testimonies of the eyewitnesses-PW2, PW3 and
PW4 are unreliable, the motive is not proved ... above manner
as regards the incident, the oral testimonies of PW2, PW3
and PW4 being the eyewitnesses is as below:
PW2 Timmaiah was a vegetable
main reasons for acquitting the accused are
that the testimonies of the eyewitnesses-PW2, PW3 and
PW4 are unreliable, the motive is not proved ... above manner
as regards the incident, the oral testimonies of PW2, PW3
and PW4 being the eyewitnesses is as below:
PW2 Timmaiah was a vegetable
prosecution.
(v) It is his further submission that the testimony
of the eyewitnesses is not trustworthy and reliable. As
per the case of the prosecution ... hand and those where it relies
upon the testimony of eyewitnesses
on the other. In the former category of
cases proof of motive is given
