amendment Act of 1976, it was found that some
sections of Ezhavas of the Malabar area were also
called Thundans but they had nothing common ... proper
verification that the person concerned belongs to
Thundan caste and not Ezhavas/Thiyyas.
. In the circumstances, the Supreme Court
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013
understanding the
central fact whether the succession as laid down in the
Ezhava Act applied to Bhagavathi Valli or not. The
absence of an issue ... suit property was obtained as
makkathayam property, by Bbagavathi Valli under the
Ezhava Act. The subject of exemption from Part IV of the
Ezhava
direct, by means of a Government Resolution,
that a section of the Ezhava/Thiyya community, which is called
Thandan, would not be included within
parents of Prabhu. Prabhu belonged to a very low caste "Ezhava" from the State of Kerala whereas Sushma belonged to an upper caste
Shweta Balaji Isankar Through Father ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 June
Court to embark upon an enquiry to determine whether a section of Ezhavas/Thiyyas which was called Thandan in the Malabar area of the State ... Order, no enquiry can be held to determine whether a section of Ezhavas/Thiyya who were called Thandan in the Malabar area of the State
whether the Scrutiny Committees has right to
consider whether people belonging to Ezhavas/Thiyyas called as
Thandan from Malbar district were included in Scheduled Caste
Sainath Gangadhar Birmod vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 June, 2017
Author
Tushar Venkatrao Pokle vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 June, 2017
Author
Sneha Sanjay Dasare vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 June, 2017
Author
