block assessment proceedings of the above persons and their associates the statements of Shri B.C. Gupta, Shri K.C. Gupta, Shri S.K. Gupta ... apparently false and fabricated document and the submissions made by the respondents in their replies are not true statements with regard to the authenticity
partnership principles, if any expressly ended in 1997. Moreover, the Petitioner fabricated an Opinion Report which was to be furnished to the Bank by including ... account of collusion between other brothers, is a wrong and factually incorrect statement. Moreover, the other brothers against whom allegations of collusion is made have
fabricated the record and has also practiced fraud not only on the respondents but this Hon'ble Board because: (i) these statements ... while those produced by the petitioner also bears his signature, these 4 statements were prepared at the instance of the petitioner who suggested
respondents itself clearly establish that the respondents have indulged in fabrication of documents and ante-dating of documents and have manipulated the process ... explanatory statement as admitted by the Respondents are dated 13.7.2005 which is subsequent to the holding of the meeting. The Explanatory Statement does not mention
annual general meeting containing the signature of the second petitioner along with statement of objections filed on 21.02.2006 or the additional reply ... general meeting and signed the attendance register. The certificates of posting are fabricated and introduced at later point of time during the proceedings. The respondents
resignation letters of petitioners 1 & 4 produced by the respondents are fabricated and forged. The filing of forms with the Registrar of Companies ... lakh to the Company herein. The bank statement of the third respondent company produced for the period from 01.06.2006 to 24.02.2007 would reflect that
company nor are its statutory records available at the registered office. Statutory statements have not been sent to the ROC for several years. I find ... reiterated their contention that the resolution dated 5 January, 2002 was not fabricated while the respondents' subsequent acts - the false plea of supplementary agenda
stating that they had filed a false affidavit and that despite specific statement made by the respondents on oath, the original share certificates ... alleged that respondents are also liable for forgery for having fabricated several documents to prove their case, the original thereof were not available and that
Smt. Vijay Khanna And Ors. vs V.K. Kapoor And Associates Pvt. Ltd., ... on 4
Ms. Heena Dutt vs Chavi Designs Pvt. Ltd. And Mr. Sandeep ... on 22 May, 2007
