Smt. Lata Urvasha vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 23 July, 2024
Manohar Dewangan. On the basis of said forged and
fabricated statement, the subject land was ordered to be
recorded in the name of accused Narayan
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 175 (1.73 seconds)Amit Mishra @ Pahlu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 18 March, 2026
allegations levelled against him are
vogue, concocted, and based on fabricated statements recorded by
the Ambikapur Police Station with an intent wrongly implicate the
applicant
Amit Mishra@Pahlu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 18 March, 2026
allegations levelled against him are
vogue, concocted, and based on fabricated statements recorded by
the Ambikapur Police Station with an intent wrongly implicate the
applicant
Amit Mishra @ Pahlu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 18 March, 2026
allegations levelled against him are
vogue, concocted, and based on fabricated statements recorded by
the Ambikapur Police Station with an intent wrongly implicate the
applicant
Amit Mishra @ Pahlu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 18 March, 2026
allegations levelled against him are
vogue, concocted, and based on fabricated statements recorded by
the Ambikapur Police Station with an intent wrongly implicate the
applicant
State Of U.P. vs Kalim Ullah And Others on 18 March, 2021
hospital to see the said statement. He came to know that the deceased had given statement against two accused persons and so far as other ... collusion with the doctor and the police, the statement of the deceased was fabricated. The deceased knew English and he could also sign in English
Radhey Shyam & Others vs State Of U.P. on 6 July, 2015
fabricating the injuries lodged a false case against him. Similarly the other two appellants namely Babloo and Chhavendra also made a similar statements and submitted ... said to be a fabricated one as multiple pellets were found in the wounds. He submitted that the statement of injured P.W.-1 Shankar
Dr. Pankaj Kumar vs Cbi/Acb on 5 July, 2019
These two descriptions are misleading facts and fabricated by CBI.
IX. That as per PW-1 statement (on page 7 para 2) mention ... Completely fictitious and fabricated story created by CBI.
X. That all over in the chargesheet (pretrap-memo, PW statements) it mentions that GC Notes were
Vinod Kumar Kashyap vs Smt. Dhaneshwari Kashyap And Oth on 9 October, 2023
witnesses have made any averments in their statements that which document
was forged and fabricated by the respondents and in what manner. The rivisional
Court
State Of U.P. vs Harendra Singh And Others on 7 October, 2017
Ramesh Chandra.
10. The accused Narendra Pal Singh in his statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C and rest accused persons denied the charges against ... submitted in his written statement before the trial court that the application given by the complainant against him is fabricated document and the allegation levelled