that after the release of the detenu on 3.7.1999, false and fabricated statements were recorded which are now shown as in-camera statements. By additional ... statements made in in-camera statements. In the present case the petitioner has set up specific case that in-camera statements were false and fabricated
camera statements. !n the present case, the petitioner has set up specific case that in camera statements were false and fabricated after the detenu ... first affidavit filed on 13.4.2000 has only denied that false and fabricated statements were recorded after the detenu was released on 3.7.1999. While denying that
2016.doc
statements. In the present case the petitioner has set up
specific case that in-camera statements were false and
fabricated after the detenu ... first affidavit filed on 13.4.2000
has only denied that false and fabricated statements
were recorded after the detenu was released on
3.7.1999. While denying that
submits that the recording of "In-
Camera" statements seems to be fabricated and got-up
statements in order to put the detenu behind ... Authority seeking approval of detention of
Detenu; the alleged in-camera statements are fabricated and not properly
verified by the Detaining Authority, the activities
The State Of Maharashtra vs Guddu Krish Yadav on 6 May, 2022
Author: Milind N
statements made in in-
camera statements. In the present case the petitioner
has set up specific case that incamera statements
were false and fabricated after ... filed on 13-4-2000 has only denied that
false and fabricated statements were recorded after
the detenu was released on 3-7-1999. While
said summons, statement of Mohd.Azhar Ali,
director was recorded on 28th February, 2019. A perusal of the said
statement of the said director recorded ... Indian Penal Code, according to which using false and fabricated
statements in the proceedings with an intention is an offence punishable
under section
delay
in passing the order of detention; the alleged in-camera statements are
fabricated and not properly verified by the Detaining Authority. She further
submits ... delay in passing
the order of detention or that in-camera statements are fabricated. It is
submitted that the ground of delay in passing
acts and there should not
be an interval, which would allow fabrication. The
statements sought to be admitted, therefore, as
forming part of res gestae ... however, slight it may
be, which was sufficient enough for fabrication,
then the statement is not part of res gestae."
In view of above
Managers and the wholesale dealers. The circumstances confirming fabrication of the documents are contained in the statements so made by them. Even if witnesses ... deliberately antedated, had also, prima facie, made fabricated documents and made false statements. Prima facie, they were conscious of the fact that the letters would
