petitioner on her facebook
wall did not automatically show up on the complainant's facebook account.
The offending posts put by the petitioner ... registered with
facebook. However, even if privacy settings are retained by a facebook
member as "private", making of an offending post
list facebook of the contemnor and that Jai Parkash JTO
was not on facebook as such he cannot see the alleged facebook post ... browbeating the judge by the above said
facebook publication" shows that alleged facebook post
was published before 24.08.2017, as if it is conveyed
petitioner produced Ext.P1, which is
alleged to be the Facebook post dated 15.07.2022 made by
Adv.Rajesh Vijayan, the then President ... Nowadays, posting on Facebook contains sarcasm, jokes
and some spontaneous reactions. The Facebook post of an
individual cannot be accepted as evidence by this Court
respondent no.2 has lodged the complaint in respect of
one Facebook post with the allegations that said
Facebook post has been created with ... Parliament. It has been alleged in the
complaint that said Facebook post has been created by
the present applicant and as such he has committed
shared some
Facebook posts. Police have no case that the petitioner was the author
of any of the posts. Sharing a post in social media ... objectionable matters on his Facebook page. However, in the
FIR, the allegation is that the petitioner had been sharing Facebook
posts defaming
FACEBOOK ACCOUNT
HAVING URL HTTPS://WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/
SURESHKUMAAR.PK
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE FACEBOOK POST PUBLISHED
BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DAMNIFYING ... FACEBOOK
ACCOUNT HAVING URL
HTTPS://WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/
SURESHKUMAAR.PK
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FACEBOOK POST PUBLISHED
BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DAMNIFYING
public.
9. Further the Plaintiff has quoted the extracts of
Facebook Post dated ... given for
performance by Bharathi Cement
Ex.P.6 Copy of Facebook post uploaded by Defendant on
02.05.2017.
Ex.P.7 Copy of Facebook post
testified that, since he was a Facebook friend
of the plaintiff at the relevant time, the Facebook posts
mentioned in his affidavit appeared ... plaintiff's reputation by this
post.
82. Apart from the above-mentioned posts, the screenshots of
posts dated 23.07.2016 and 25.10.2016 have not been
plaintiff's reputation by this post.
82. Apart from the above-mentioned posts, the screenshots
of posts dated 23.07.2016 and 25.10.2016 have not
been ... judgment, Ld. Trial Court conducted a
thorough post-by-post analysis of approximately 20 Facebook
entries, most authored by the brother
bhikhari. Ld.
Counsel for the complainant has also referred to a
Facebook post Ex. CW4/A to prove the said fact. He has
also ... case of illegal detention.
13.He has next referred to the Facebook post and submitted
that it nowhere mentions the name of Roshan
