Badri Prasad and another Vs. Gyan Prakash and others ). FAFO No.1282 of 2010, filed under section 6 A of the Court Fees ... therefore, appellants were directed to amend the plaint.
Aggrieved with this order, FAFO No.1282 of 2010 ( Badri Prasad and others Vs. Gyan Prakash
impugned final judgment and order dated 07/02/2006
in FAFO No. 115/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO No. 117/1997,07/02/2006 ... FAFO No. 118/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO No. 119/1997,07/02/2006 in
FAFO No. 123/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO
impugned final judgment and order dated 07/02/2006
in FAFO No. 115/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO No. 117/1997,07/02/2006 ... FAFO No. 118/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO No. 119/1997,07/02/2006 in
FAFO No. 123/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO
impugned final judgment and order dated
07/02/2006 in FAFO No. 115/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO No.
117/1997,07/02/2006 ... FAFO No. 118/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO No.
119/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO No. 123/1997,07/02/2006 in FAFO
Mission/Society in view of interim order dated 31.07.1984 passed in FAFO No. 439 of 1984 which ultimately merged and became final in view ... objection under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC , he (Umesh Chandra Saxena) preferred FAFO No. 15 of 2001 wherein no interim order has been passed
Delivered by Hon'ble Krishna Murari, J.)
By means of this FAFO, the appellants have challenged the judgment and order dated 07.03.2013 passed ... published on 28.03.2008. The appellants herein challenged the award by filing FAFO (D) No. 1370 of 2008 before this Court. The said appeal was presented
court on 14.11.1985, which was affirmed by this Court on 20.12.1985, in FAFO No. 929 of 1985. An application for injunction in the suit ... issued. This order of trial court was challenged before this Court in FAFO No. 905 of 1995, which was summarily rejected, under Order 41 Rule
respondents in accordance with their need.
Aggrieved with this award, the present FAFO has been filed. In the memo of appeal, inter-alia grounds have ... respondents, after passage of more than a decade, during the hearing of FAFO, the appellant wants to raise a technical plea, which deprives
which had led to the proceedings before the Division Bench in an FAFO took place at 6.30 pm on 24 December 2010 when Surya Prakash ... expeditiously implemented.
The reference is answered in the aforesaid terms. The FAFO shall now be placed before the appropriate Bench according to the roster
Gulab Singh and two others, the Division Bench of this Court in FAFO No.156 of 2015 vide judgment dated 21st January, 2015, after discussing
