Judgment and order dated 21.04.2006
passed by the High Court1 in FAFO (First Appeal From Order) No.2473 of
2005; and (ii) the Order dated ... Recall Application) No. 107616 of 2009 preferred in
Signature Not Verified
said FAFO No. 2473 of 2005.
Digitally signed by Dr.
Mukesh Nasa
Date
list of fresh cases of 9.3.94 at Sr. No. 5 FAFO Record No. 22793 M/s. Bansal Forgings Ltd. v. U.P.F. Corp. filed ... existing security for its payment.
E. The Company filed an FAFO being No. 229793/94 against the portion of the order directing furnishing of security
High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad, Lucknow Bench at Lucknow in FAFO No.171 of 2001.
Respondent's husband R.K. Srivastava was employed
judgment and order passed by the Tribunal, the Railways
preferred an appeal (FAFO No.277 of 1999) before the Lucknow Bench of
the Allahabad High
Feeling aggrieved, FCI filed an appeal (FAFO No. 343/2005)
before the Allahabad High Court. The High Court dismissed the
appeal by a brief order
impugned judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dated
06.02.2004 passed in FAFO No.2103/2003.
It appears that the appellant was the plaintiff
Subsequently renumbered as Other Original Suit (OOS) No 1 of 1989.
6
FAFO No 154 of 1951
7
Regular Suit no 25 of 1950 (subsequently
Against the order passed by
the District Judge, an FAO, i.e. FAFO (D) No.1304/2011
3
was filed before the High Court
impugned final judgment and order dated 12-12-2014
in FAFO No. 2337/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad)
FIRDAUS Petitioner ... impugned final judgment and order dated 12-12-2014
in FAFO No. 2337/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad)
FIRDAUS Petitioner
Division
Bench of the Allahabad High Court disposing of appeal (FAFO
No. 1339-D of 2007) which was preferred by the appellant
against the order
