Nalini Prabhakar vs University Of Delhi & Anr. on 29 July, 2011
that the Petitioner cannot escape
the process of an open and fair selection process meant for regular appointment.
Reference has been made in the said
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 969 (1.39 seconds)Sanjay And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 March, 2011
they
have denied any unfairness in the selection process and have stated that the
process was fair and since the petitioners have lost after competing ... grievance qua the
selection process. It has been averred in the reply that the first, second and
third round of selection process pertain
S.Madhavan vs The Secretary on 8 December, 2011
were summoned for Oral Test. This will prove that the selection process is fair in all aspects. Therefore, the act of the Commission ... Constitution of India. As the Commission's selection process is fair and according to the established rules, there is nothing illegal or unjustifiable
Union Of India vs M.K.Ramaswamy on 3 August, 2011
have been done was to have a fair selection process.
But without any sort of selection process, some of the claimants
were arbitrarily selected ... 30676/2007 4
fairness tantamounting to denial of justice. Lack of transparency
and fairness in selection process are good reasons for judicial
interference. The Tribunal
K.E.Shanavas vs State Of Kerala on 4 February, 2011
direction commanding respondents 1 to 4
to conduct a transparent and fair selection process for
appointment to the post of Welfare Officer under the
second
Rakesh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 10 February, 2011
that they were recruited from the open market by following a fair selection process. On the other hand, from the foregoing discussion it is clear
U.P. Secondary Education Service ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... on 21 January, 2011
statutory body concerned with process of fair selection and recommendations it should ordinarily not have any interest in seeking appointment of the selected candidates
Anil Kumar & Others vs State Of U.P. & Others on 25 November, 2011
team, which in our opinion was inappropriate. While testing the fairness of the selection process wherein thousands of candidates were involved, the High Court should ... selection process was tainted, and to determine whether the illegalities pointed out go to the root of the matter and vitiate the entire selection process
Dr Arif Husain Khan vs State Of Raj & Anr on 19 April, 2011
were also permitted to participate in the process of selection, resulting into depriving a right of fair consideration of the petitioners who were otherwise eligible ... petitioners have not been deprived of their right of fair consideration in process of selection held pursuant to advertisement impugned.
Consequently, writ petitions fail
Sr.Law Manager,Indian Oil Corp.Ld.& ... vs Guru Shakti Singh & Anr on 14 February, 2011
some one or excluding some one, vitiates the
entire selection process. Such a selection process cannot be
saved by holding that the person in regard ... selection process, the withdrawal of writ petition on death
of the aggrieved complainant lost significance. The issue,
as already noticed, is whether the selection process