Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 255 (1.17 seconds)

Pooran vs Union Of India on 7 October, 2010

charge was that he has given a false education certificate. How the certificate was false is given in the statement of charge that ... false if the school authority denies issue of such certificate. Similarly a certificate could be false if there is no such school. In fact
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gayatri Devi vs M/O Communications on 30 August, 2023

issuing the caste certificate and after local inquiry the ST caste certificate was issued to him and original caste certificate was deposited by the applicant ... recruitment was false. This fact that Shri Chhatrapal was his own brother and he was dismissed for producing false caste certificate is not denied
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashwani Kumar Dube vs M/O Defence on 27 September, 2023

initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced false certificate in order to secure appointment, he should not be retained in service ... initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced a false certificate in order to secure appointment, he should not be retained
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Kumar Pal vs D/O Post on 9 September, 2024

initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced a false certificate in order to secure appointment, he should not be retained ... applicant that his appointment has been reviewed two / three times is absolutely false and baseless. More than 132 engagements made across several GDS posts were
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ajay Kumar Pal vs D/O Post on 9 September, 2024

initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced a false certificate in order to secure appointment, he should not be retained ... applicant that his appointment has been reviewed two / three times is absolutely false and baseless. More than 132 engagements made across several GDS posts were
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Km Pinki Singh vs Post Up Circle on 13 September, 2024

initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced a false certificate in order to secure appointment, she should not be retained ... applicant that her appointment has been reviewed two / three times is absolutely false and baseless. More than 132 engagements made across several GDS posts were
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gaurav Singh Yadav vs Post Up Circle on 12 September, 2024

initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced a false certificate in order to secure appointment, he should not be retained ... applicant that his appointment has been reviewed two / three times is absolutely false and baseless. More than 132 engagements made across several GDS posts were
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Himanshu Mishra vs Post Up Circle on 17 September, 2024

initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced a false certificate in order to secure appointment, he should not be retained ... applicant that his appointment has been reviewed two / three times is absolutely false and baseless. More than 132 engagements made across several GDS posts were
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Sekhar Awasthi vs D/O Post on 9 September, 2024

initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced a false certificate in order to secure appointment, he should not be retained ... applicant that his appointment has been reviewed two / three times is absolutely false and baseless. More than 132 engagements made across several GDS posts were
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Satya Prakash vs D/O Post on 9 September, 2024

initial recruitment in service or had furnished false information or produced a false certificate in order to secure appointment, he should not be retained ... applicant that his appointment has been reviewed two / three times is absolutely false and baseless. More than 132 engagements made across several GDS posts were
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next