title over the suit property and claimed declaration and also
partition by this false and frivolous suit and prayed for dismissal of the suit
Vennila tortured the deceased
and compelled her to give false statement including the dying declaration,
thereby implicating the petitioner as accused. In support ... There is absolutely no necessary for the
second respondent to foist the false case as against the petitioner. The final
report has been filed
aunty Vennila were tutoring the
deceased and had given false statement including dying declaration
implicating the petitioner's husband as first accused. The parents
plaintiff in brief is as follows:-
3.1. The suit is filed for declaration and injunction. The
suit property belongs to the plaintiff. It was originally ... receipt of the same, the defendant
replied with false averments. Hence, the suit is filed for declaration and
injunction as against the defendant
such the plaintiff resisted the same. Hence the suit
for declaration declaring the plaintiff’s right to use the ‘A’ schedule
property and restraining ... plaint as false and frivolous. There is a common Well belonged to the
plaintiff, defendant and the third party in which the plaintiff
brief is as
follows :-
3.1. The suit is filed for declaration and recovery of possession.
The suit property originally belonged to one late ... same the
defendant replied by his reply notice dated 09.09.1990 containing false and
untenable allegations. Hence the suit.
4. Resisting the same, the defendant filed
said Ponnusamy from the defendants 2 & 3. Hence
the suit for declaration declaring that the plaintiff is the legal heir of the
deceased Ponnusamy ... written statement
stating that all the avernments made in the plaint is false and frivolous. The
deceased Ponnusamy was living with the first defendant
this suit that the Gopala Gounder's son is claiming false
title to have purchased the suit properties from Senthamarai Ammal in the year ... enjoyment of the first plaintiff. Hence,
the plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction as against the
defendant.
4. The case
which the interim injunction granted. Hence, the suit for
declaration and permanent injunction.
6. Resisting the same, the defendants filed a written statement and
stated ... Therefore, no encroachment
were made by the defendants and it is absolutely false and prayed for
dismissal of the suit.
7. Both the suits clubbed
husband of the third defendant. Therefore, the
plaintiffs filed suit for declaration and injunction as against the defendants.
4. Resisting the same, the defendants ... derived by the said Gangaiammal by settlement deed dated 09.06.1974 is
false and created one. Till the death of the said Gangaimmal