observed as
under:
"Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.375-RAPE-FALSE
IMPLICATION-Rape-False implication of accused-
Normally improbable-Rape leaves a permanent ... EVIDENCE-Rape-
Evidence and proof-Medical evidence and evidence
of victim aged 10years proving rape-Suggestion to
victim of false implication of accused
observed that:
" Sec.375 IPC-Rape-false implication of accused-normally
improbable-Rape leaves a permanent scar and has a serious
psychological impact ... family members-
No one would normally concoct a story of rape just to falsely
implicate a person".
46. To sum up, in the present
State By Jeevan Bheema Nagar Police vs Madan.D on 23 February, 2017
IN THE
this
much money then he will implicate her husband in a false case of rape
(agar wo ye paisa nahi deti to uske pati ... will implicate my husband (usne kaha ki mai tumare pati ko
fasa degi). Thereafter, my husband has been implicated in a rape case
that :
'Penal Code 1860 - Sec. 376 - Offence of rape - False implication in
- Not uncommon - charges of rape are not uncommon - In some
cases parents ... financial liability.
Appreciation of evidence - False implication - failure of defence to
prove motive for false implication will be inconsequential where
prosecution had failed to prove
prosecutrix threatened him to implicate
the accused in some false case and that on 03.09.2008, accused was
falsely implicated in the present case by prosecutrix ... victim of the rape of the
present case may be prosecuted under the law for his false
deposition or the false implication of the accused
Gullu or Rajesh @ Raju had ever threatened her to falsely
implicate her sons in rape case. She has only alleged that
accused persons were asking ... Gullu has given any threat
to her to falsely implicate her sons in rape case. Rather, in the
cross examination conducted by Ld counsel
falsely implicated. It was pleaded that complainant party had some
dispute with accused Rajender @ Tholu and others being his friends were
falsely implicated. Rape ... been an
attempt for settlement between the parties. Accused had been falsely
implicated. Defence Evidence was closed by the statement of Shri J.P.
Singh
emotional or highly disturbed state of mind owing to false
implication in the rape case. The Court held that “the appellant did
not mitigate ... emotional instability caused by the false implication in a rape
case with one of the deceased. In short, the appellant has not
mitigated the circumstances
likely that her
parents would have implicated the appellant in a false case of
rape of their daughter, conscious as they would be that
reporting ... mother of the
prosecutrix were to implicate the appellant in a false case of
rape, she would have alleged rape with her and not with
