Umesh Gupta vs State 12 Cra/31/2003 Santosh Sahu ... on 12 April, 2019
Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been
falsely implicated. No rape has been committed by him with the
prosecutrix. Trial Court
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 4347 (5.02 seconds)State vs Swatantara Bharat And Ors on 29 March, 2019
failed to discharge its onus to prove the rape on the prosecutrix.
False implication
34. The main thrust of argument as raised ... that rape causes great
distress and humiliation to the victim of rape but
at the same time false allegation of committing a
rape also causes
State (Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi) vs Maqbool Khan on 1 February, 2019
causes great suffering and
embarrassment to the prosecrutrix, contrarily false implication of
committing a rape also results in defamining the reputation and social ... that rape causes great
distress and humiliation to the victim of rape but at
the same time false allegation of committing a rape
also causes
State vs Vimal Kumar @ Karwa on 11 December, 2019
causes great suffering and
embarrassment to the victim, contrarily false implication of
committing a rape also results in defaming the reputation and social
dignity ... that rape causes great distress
and humiliation to the victim of rape but at the same
time false allegation of committing a rape also causes
State vs Satyavir on 28 November, 2019
causes great suffering and
embarrassment to the prosecutrix, contrarily false implication of
committing a rape also results in defaming the reputation and social
dignity ... that rape causes great distress
and humiliation to the victim of rape but at the same
time false allegation of committing a rape also causes
Shriram Urav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Now C.G. 24 ... on 25 April, 2019
Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been
falsely implicated. No rape has been committed by him with the
prosecutrix. Trial Court ... Supreme Court has dealt with the false
implication, the relevant portion of para 22 which reads as under :-
"22. "...................... In any event
Domara Prasad vs State Of Chhattisgarh 55 ... on 11 April, 2019
Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been
falsely implicated. No rape has been committed by him with the
prosecutrix. Trial Court ... intercourse or rape,sufficient
to disbelieve the victim. However courts should , at the same
time, bear in mind that false charges of rape
Sunil Kashinath Shelke vs The State Of Maharashtra on 24 April, 2019
defence of the appellant was that of total denial and false
implication.
The learned District Judge - 5 and Additional Sessions Judge,
Thane, after considering ... regard to
the evidence, the possibility of the appellant being falsely implicated for
rape, cannot be ruled out, as the marriage did not materialize
Vinod Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh 67 Wppil/36/2019 ... on 24 June, 2019
Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been
falsely implicated. No rape has been committed by him with the
prosecutrix. Trial Court ... intercourse or rape,sufficient
to disbelieve the victim. However courts should , at the same
time, bear in mind that false charges of rape
Achhelal vs The State Of C.G. 7 Mcrc/2338/2019 Sunny ... on 5 April, 2019
Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been
falsely implicated. No rape has been committed by him with the
prosecutrix. Trial Court ... falsely implicate in criminal case. Moreover, it is absurd that on account
of due amount the prosecutrix would falsely involve appellant in rape
case