else
she would drag the Plaintiff's husband in a false rape
case. When the Plaintiff went to the Police Station, the
Plaintiff ... Plaintiff's
husband and her father-in-law in a false rape case.
iv. The Defendant instructed, one of her associates, over
the phone
else
she would drag the Plaintiff's husband in a false rape
case. When the Plaintiff went to the Police Station, the
Plaintiff ... Plaintiff's
husband and her father-in-law in a false rape case.
iv. The Defendant instructed, one of her associates, over
the phone
respondent
no. 2/complainant to implicate him in a false rape case.
20. Admittedly, the respondent no. 2/complainant is
posted as SDO in MTNL ... falsely implicated and was pressurized by the police
to sign the cheque in question under the threat to be
implicated in a false rape case
respondent
no. 2/complainant to implicate him in a false rape case.
20. Admittedly, the respondent no. 2/complainant is
posted as SDO in MTNL ... falsely implicated and was pressurized by the police
to sign the cheque in question under the threat to be
implicated in a false rape case
respondent
no. 2/complainant to implicate him in a false rape case.
20. Admittedly, the respondent no. 2/complainant is
posted as SDO in MTNL ... falsely implicated and was pressurized by the police
to sign the cheque in question under the threat to be
implicated in a false rape case
respondent no.
2/complainant to implicate him in a false rape case.
20. Admittedly, the respondent no. 2/complainant is posted as
SDO in MTNL ... falsely implicated and was
pressurized by the police to sign the cheque in question under the
threat to be implicated in a false rape case
respondent no.
2/complainant to implicate him in a false rape case.
20. Admittedly, the respondent no. 2/complainant is posted as
SDO in MTNL ... falsely implicated and was
pressurized by the police to sign the cheque in question under the
threat to be implicated in a false rape case
respondent
no. 2/complainant to implicate him in a false rape case.
20. Admittedly, the respondent no. 2/complainant is
posted as SDO in MTNL ... falsely implicated and was pressurized by the police
to sign the cheque in question under the threat to be
implicated in a false rape case
State vs Birchha Singh And Ors on 7 November, 2024
IN THE COURT OF DEEPALI
accused again started following them, threatened to implicate them in a
false rape case, threatened to kill the complainant, abused her, and left ... threatened to
implicate her and her employer Kiran in a false rape case, although
pertinently, neither in her initial complaint nor in her statement
