falsely applying trade marks. -
(1) A person shall be deemed to falsify a trade mark who, either, -
*****
(b) falsifies any genuine trade mark, whether ... trade mark who, without
the assent of the proprietor of the trade mark, -
(a) applies such trade mark or a deceptively similar mark to goods
Penalty for applying false trade marks, trade
descriptions, etc.--Any person who--
(a) falsifies any trade mark; or
(b) falsely applies to goods or services ... under :-
Penalty for selling goods or providing services to
which false trade mark or false trade description
is applied.--Any person who sells, lets
Penalty for applying false trade marks, trade descriptions, etc.
--Any person who--
(a) falsifies any trade mark; or
(b) falsely applies to goods or services ... Under:-
Penalty for selling goods or providing services to which
false trade mark or false trade description is applied.--
Any person who sells, lets
trade mark infringement
and passing off. It has been held by the Supreme Court that at the
interlocutory stage in trade mark matters, the Court ... February, 2006 for registration of the trade mark 'REGAL'. The
Plaintiffs have further made a false statement that after 2008 till
2017, they
trade mark infringement
and passing off. It has been held by the Supreme Court that at the
interlocutory stage in trade mark matters, the Court ... February, 2006 for registration of the trade mark 'REGAL'. The
Plaintiffs have further made a false statement that after 2008 till
2017, they
trade mark infringement
and passing off. It has been held by the Supreme Court that at the
interlocutory stage in trade mark matters, the Court ... February, 2006 for registration of the trade mark 'REGAL'. The
Plaintiffs have further made a false statement that after 2008 till
2017, they
trade mark infringement
and passing off. It has been held by the Supreme Court that at the
interlocutory stage in trade mark matters, the Court ... February, 2006 for registration of the trade mark 'REGAL'. The
Plaintiffs have further made a false statement that after 2008 till
2017, they
trade mark infringement
and passing off. It has been held by the Supreme Court that at the
interlocutory stage in trade mark matters, the Court ... February, 2006 for registration of the trade mark 'REGAL'. The
Plaintiffs have further made a false statement that after 2008 till
2017, they
trade mark infringement
and passing off. It has been held by the Supreme Court that at the
interlocutory stage in trade mark matters, the Court ... February, 2006 for registration of the trade mark 'REGAL'. The
Plaintiffs have further made a false statement that after 2008 till
2017, they
Registered Proprietor of the trade mark commences and prosecutes an action
against the person threatened, for infringement of the trade mark, then ... issuance of warrants
for search & seizure of goods bearing false trade mark, labels, etc.; but prior
to the date of the filing
