application inter alia taking the
plea that issue regarding validity of Farad Badar No. 3 dated 4.6.2003
has already been decided in Civil Suit ... respectively. The said suit was dismissed on the
ground of jurisdiction. Farad Badar No. 3 was declared void. More so, if
the proposed amendment
Singh and to cause
wrongful loss to Bhai Maha Singh, prepared Farad Badar No.6. Accused
2 of 11
::: Downloaded ... jamabandis were not wrong. Accused
No.3 Saroop Singh attested this farad badar with malafide intention on
28.09.1993 and permitted to change the entries wrongly
when the
Petitioner received complaint from Gurtej Singh, he immediately made Farad Badar with
regard to mutation no.11123 in the revenue record. Therefore ... only allegation against the Petitioner
is that while recording, Farad Badar the mutation no. 11123 was not mentioned in it. It
would
ownership of the plaintiff and on the basis of
such report, Farad Badar No.60 dated 12.12.2011 was sanctioned by the Circle
Revenue Officer, whereby ... amount earlier paid to him. The plaintiff pleaded
that the said Farad Badar and the notices issued pursuant thereto we
were
re illegal, null
plaintiffs should have
approached the competent revenue authorities for issuance of
Farad Badar if their claim was found to be correct. The Trial Court
held ... well as the appeal was sought on the
ground that Farad Badar had been issued in favour of the plaintiffs
and the mistake
Revenue Department, on which,
Bhagwan Das Patwari made entry vide Farad Badar No.16 dated 18.07. 2022 in
Jama Bandi register, that Share of actual ... necessary to mention here that at the time of making Farad Badar with regard
to the wrong entry regarding transfer of Land of Gurtej singh
revenue department in the
absence of the plaintiffs and thereby wrong Farad Badar No.2 dated
29.10.1991 came to be sanctioned by the Assistant Collector ... mistake which had occurred in the revenue department by way of Farad
Badar No.2 and it is only thereafter that the defendants moved
Patwari connived with the respondents-
defendants by making entry in the Farad Badar No.2 dated 28.11.1996 and
it is, in this backdrop ... matter, the suit, aforementioned, was filed. The
farad badar could not have been rectified without any order of the
competent Court as both the entries
decree could be corrected by way of farad badar
in the jamabandi at any stage without any legal
complications. In the light of this ... stating that he was not
competent to make any correction in farad badar. The matter was disposed
of by Sub Divisional Magistrate on 16.12.2004 holding
jurisdiction to order correction in the record of rights by 'Farad Badar' as only the Civil Court has the jurisdiction to order correction
