without any fare or consideration. That
passenger tax as contemplated under the Act of 1955 was to be
levied only on fare-paying passengers against ... passenger travelled on every seat of every
bus; every employee travelled the full distance shown in the
logbook; and every passenger was paying a fare
paying passenger, gratuitous passenger and a passenger who is the owner of the goods held that, the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation ... policy. Therefore, fare paying passengers, gratuitous passengers or even employees other than conductor and ticket collector in a public service vehicle, passengers in a goods
liability of the Company to pay compensation, as per IMT-37A, it is stated that for non-fare paying passengers, other than employees ... owner of a vehicle can pay an additional premium of Rs.75/- for a non-fare paying passenger, which is not required, in the case
reward and since the vehicle was used for reward by carrying fare-paying passengers, he submitted that the insurer was not liable to indemnify ... that was payable by the owner in the case of the fare-paying passenger and in that case the owner of the goods. Their Lordships
premium of Rs. 36/-, apart from the liability to authorised non-fare paying passengers as per END IMT 14(b) imposed in the policy ... carry passengers in the goods vehicle and yet he carries passengers relying on Clause 14 (b) which authorises non-fare paying passengers to travel
paying fare to the driver. In other words, the finding that the deceased were travelling in the lorry as fare paying passengers has become conclusively ... part of the insurer to cover the risk of fare paying or non fare paying passengers in the vehicle unless that is the subject
reward and since the vehicle was used for reward by carrying fare paying passengers, he submitted that the Insurer was not liable to indemnify ... that was payable by the owner in the case of the fare paying passenger and in that case the owner of the goods. Their Lordships
vehicle was not permitted to carry any passenger as a
fare paying passenger. That, no risk of the fare paying
passenger was covered ... recovered by the insurance
company for L.L. to non-fare paying passenger as per IMT 14
and that, no liability of the insurance company
premium of Rs. 36/-, apart from the liability to authorised non-fare paying passengers as per END IMT 14 (b) imposed in the policy ... carry passengers in the goods vehicle and yet he carries passengers relying on Clause 14(b) which authorises non-fare paying passengers to travel
travelling in a standard aircraft, and was further
not a farepaying passenger in any regular scheduled airline or
air charter company, which excluded ... traveling in
2
any aircraft or balloon other than as a passenger (fare
paying or otherwise) in any duly licensed standard type
of aircraft anywhere
