Vijay Singh vs State Of M.P on 1 November, 2022
Vijay Singh vs State Of M.P on 1 November, 2022
Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 7391 (3.24 seconds)Ms. Shama Parveen vs Ministry Of Home Affairs (Mha). on 26 December, 2008
against Shri R. C. Mina, SI Crime Branch 9.4.2005
regarding shoddy/ faulty investigation and demand of
huge bribe, shown and submitted to the Joint ... against Shri R. C. Mina, SI Crime Branch 24.4.2003
regarding shoddy/ faulty investigation and demand of
huge bribe shown and submitted to the Joint
Shakuntaladevi vs State on 12 January, 2012
accused persons
are likely to get the benefit of such a faulty investigation and even
some accused persons have also filed the discharge applications ... recorded and even the investigation is
faulty and the benefit of such faulty investigation is likely to be
taken by the accused persons
State Of Kerala vs Krishnan on 25 August, 2020
there would be no free and fair investigation. The
investigation unto then, is defective, faulty and malafidely done and to
have an independent free ... marked as such in the writ
petition, is another instance of faulty investigation. The contention is
that though the prayer
Shakuntaladevi vs State
accused persons
are likely to get the benefit of such a faulty investigation and even
some accused persons have also filed the discharge applications ... recorded and even the investigation is
faulty and the benefit of such faulty investigation is likely to be
taken by the accused persons
Brijbasi Lal And Another vs State Of U.P. on 27 April, 2026
elaborated the principles wherein it is held that merely the faulty investigation will not be beneficiary to the accused, if the evidence of eye witnesses ... Motilal v. State of Rajasthan8
11.It is true that a faulty investigation cannot be a determinative factor and would not be sufficient to throw
1 State vs Harvinder, Fir No. 373/03, Ps New Ashok ... on 1 February, 2010
1 State vs Harvinder, Fir No. 373/03, Ps New Ashok ... on 1 February, 2010
State vs Mohd Danish@Aasif on 21 November, 2023
weapon is not sine qua non for proving
the offence and faulty investigation can never be a ground to
reject the case of the prosecution ... recovered, the investigation is faulty and therefore the case of
the prosecution is false. Ld. APP has submitted that faulty
investigation cannot be a situation
Tomaso Bruno & Anr vs State Of U.P on 20 January, 2015
further submitted that the courts below
ought to have noticed the faulty investigation and non-collection of CCTV
footage, sim details and lapses ... details of mobile phones seized from the accused are instances of faulty
investigation and the same would not affect the prosecution case. Non-
production
Dhanni @ Dhaniram And Ors. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 December, 2006
prosecution. According to the learned Government Advocate if there is faulty investigation, the real culprit should not be benefited and in that regard two decisions ... with the contention of learned Government Advocate that on account of faulty investigation accused persons should not be benefitted, but in the present case there